26.6. unittest.mock
— getting started¶
Nuevo en la versión 3.3.
26.6.1. Using Mock¶
26.6.1.1. Mock Patching Methods¶
Common uses for Mock
objects include:
- Patching methods
- Recording method calls on objects
You might want to replace a method on an object to check that it is called with the correct arguments by another part of the system:
>>> real = SomeClass()
>>> real.method = MagicMock(name='method')
>>> real.method(3, 4, 5, key='value')
<MagicMock name='method()' id='...'>
Once our mock has been used (real.method
in this example) it has methods
and attributes that allow you to make assertions about how it has been used.
Nota
In most of these examples the Mock
and MagicMock
classes
are interchangeable. As the MagicMock
is the more capable class it makes
a sensible one to use by default.
Once the mock has been called its called
attribute is set to
True
. More importantly we can use the assert_called_with()
or
assert_called_once_with()
method to check that it was called with
the correct arguments.
This example tests that calling ProductionClass().method
results in a call to
the something
method:
>>> class ProductionClass:
... def method(self):
... self.something(1, 2, 3)
... def something(self, a, b, c):
... pass
...
>>> real = ProductionClass()
>>> real.something = MagicMock()
>>> real.method()
>>> real.something.assert_called_once_with(1, 2, 3)
26.6.1.2. Mock for Method Calls on an Object¶
In the last example we patched a method directly on an object to check that it was called correctly. Another common use case is to pass an object into a method (or some part of the system under test) and then check that it is used in the correct way.
The simple ProductionClass
below has a closer
method. If it is called with
an object then it calls close
on it.
>>> class ProductionClass:
... def closer(self, something):
... something.close()
...
So to test it we need to pass in an object with a close
method and check
that it was called correctly.
>>> real = ProductionClass()
>>> mock = Mock()
>>> real.closer(mock)
>>> mock.close.assert_called_with()
We don’t have to do any work to provide the “close” method on our mock.
Accessing close creates it. So, if “close” hasn’t already been called then
accessing it in the test will create it, but assert_called_with()
will raise a failure exception.
26.6.1.3. Mocking Classes¶
A common use case is to mock out classes instantiated by your code under test. When you patch a class, then that class is replaced with a mock. Instances are created by calling the class. This means you access the «mock instance» by looking at the return value of the mocked class.
In the example below we have a function some_function
that instantiates Foo
and calls a method on it. The call to patch()
replaces the class Foo
with a
mock. The Foo
instance is the result of calling the mock, so it is configured
by modifying the mock return_value
.
>>> def some_function():
... instance = module.Foo()
... return instance.method()
...
>>> with patch('module.Foo') as mock:
... instance = mock.return_value
... instance.method.return_value = 'the result'
... result = some_function()
... assert result == 'the result'
26.6.1.4. Naming your mocks¶
It can be useful to give your mocks a name. The name is shown in the repr of the mock and can be helpful when the mock appears in test failure messages. The name is also propagated to attributes or methods of the mock:
>>> mock = MagicMock(name='foo')
>>> mock
<MagicMock name='foo' id='...'>
>>> mock.method
<MagicMock name='foo.method' id='...'>
26.6.1.5. Tracking all Calls¶
Often you want to track more than a single call to a method. The
mock_calls
attribute records all calls
to child attributes of the mock - and also to their children.
>>> mock = MagicMock()
>>> mock.method()
<MagicMock name='mock.method()' id='...'>
>>> mock.attribute.method(10, x=53)
<MagicMock name='mock.attribute.method()' id='...'>
>>> mock.mock_calls
[call.method(), call.attribute.method(10, x=53)]
If you make an assertion about mock_calls
and any unexpected methods
have been called, then the assertion will fail. This is useful because as well
as asserting that the calls you expected have been made, you are also checking
that they were made in the right order and with no additional calls:
You use the call
object to construct lists for comparing with
mock_calls
:
>>> expected = [call.method(), call.attribute.method(10, x=53)]
>>> mock.mock_calls == expected
True
26.6.1.6. Setting Return Values and Attributes¶
Setting the return values on a mock object is trivially easy:
>>> mock = Mock()
>>> mock.return_value = 3
>>> mock()
3
Of course you can do the same for methods on the mock:
>>> mock = Mock()
>>> mock.method.return_value = 3
>>> mock.method()
3
The return value can also be set in the constructor:
>>> mock = Mock(return_value=3)
>>> mock()
3
If you need an attribute setting on your mock, just do it:
>>> mock = Mock()
>>> mock.x = 3
>>> mock.x
3
Sometimes you want to mock up a more complex situation, like for example
mock.connection.cursor().execute("SELECT 1")
. If we wanted this call to
return a list, then we have to configure the result of the nested call.
We can use call
to construct the set of calls in a «chained call» like
this for easy assertion afterwards:
>>> mock = Mock()
>>> cursor = mock.connection.cursor.return_value
>>> cursor.execute.return_value = ['foo']
>>> mock.connection.cursor().execute("SELECT 1")
['foo']
>>> expected = call.connection.cursor().execute("SELECT 1").call_list()
>>> mock.mock_calls
[call.connection.cursor(), call.connection.cursor().execute('SELECT 1')]
>>> mock.mock_calls == expected
True
It is the call to .call_list()
that turns our call object into a list of
calls representing the chained calls.
26.6.1.7. Raising exceptions with mocks¶
A useful attribute is side_effect
. If you set this to an
exception class or instance then the exception will be raised when the mock
is called.
>>> mock = Mock(side_effect=Exception('Boom!'))
>>> mock()
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
Exception: Boom!
26.6.1.8. Side effect functions and iterables¶
side_effect
can also be set to a function or an iterable. The use case for
side_effect
as an iterable is where your mock is going to be called several
times, and you want each call to return a different value. When you set
side_effect
to an iterable every call to the mock returns the next value
from the iterable:
>>> mock = MagicMock(side_effect=[4, 5, 6])
>>> mock()
4
>>> mock()
5
>>> mock()
6
For more advanced use cases, like dynamically varying the return values
depending on what the mock is called with, side_effect
can be a function.
The function will be called with the same arguments as the mock. Whatever the
function returns is what the call returns:
>>> vals = {(1, 2): 1, (2, 3): 2}
>>> def side_effect(*args):
... return vals[args]
...
>>> mock = MagicMock(side_effect=side_effect)
>>> mock(1, 2)
1
>>> mock(2, 3)
2
26.6.1.9. Creating a Mock from an Existing Object¶
One problem with over use of mocking is that it couples your tests to the
implementation of your mocks rather than your real code. Suppose you have a
class that implements some_method
. In a test for another class, you
provide a mock of this object that also provides some_method
. If later
you refactor the first class, so that it no longer has some_method
- then
your tests will continue to pass even though your code is now broken!
Mock
allows you to provide an object as a specification for the mock,
using the spec keyword argument. Accessing methods / attributes on the
mock that don’t exist on your specification object will immediately raise an
attribute error. If you change the implementation of your specification, then
tests that use that class will start failing immediately without you having to
instantiate the class in those tests.
>>> mock = Mock(spec=SomeClass)
>>> mock.old_method()
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
AttributeError: object has no attribute 'old_method'
Using a specification also enables a smarter matching of calls made to the mock, regardless of whether some parameters were passed as positional or named arguments:
>>> def f(a, b, c): pass
...
>>> mock = Mock(spec=f)
>>> mock(1, 2, 3)
<Mock name='mock()' id='140161580456576'>
>>> mock.assert_called_with(a=1, b=2, c=3)
If you want this smarter matching to also work with method calls on the mock, you can use auto-speccing.
If you want a stronger form of specification that prevents the setting of arbitrary attributes as well as the getting of them then you can use spec_set instead of spec.
26.6.2. Patch Decorators¶
Nota
With patch()
it matters that you patch objects in the namespace where
they are looked up. This is normally straightforward, but for a quick guide
read where to patch.
A common need in tests is to patch a class attribute or a module attribute, for example patching a builtin or patching a class in a module to test that it is instantiated. Modules and classes are effectively global, so patching on them has to be undone after the test or the patch will persist into other tests and cause hard to diagnose problems.
mock provides three convenient decorators for this: patch()
, patch.object()
and
patch.dict()
. patch
takes a single string, of the form
package.module.Class.attribute
to specify the attribute you are patching. It
also optionally takes a value that you want the attribute (or class or
whatever) to be replaced with. “patch.object” takes an object and the name of
the attribute you would like patched, plus optionally the value to patch it
with.
patch.object
:
>>> original = SomeClass.attribute
>>> @patch.object(SomeClass, 'attribute', sentinel.attribute)
... def test():
... assert SomeClass.attribute == sentinel.attribute
...
>>> test()
>>> assert SomeClass.attribute == original
>>> @patch('package.module.attribute', sentinel.attribute)
... def test():
... from package.module import attribute
... assert attribute is sentinel.attribute
...
>>> test()
If you are patching a module (including builtins
) then use patch()
instead of patch.object()
:
>>> mock = MagicMock(return_value=sentinel.file_handle)
>>> with patch('builtins.open', mock):
... handle = open('filename', 'r')
...
>>> mock.assert_called_with('filename', 'r')
>>> assert handle == sentinel.file_handle, "incorrect file handle returned"
The module name can be “dotted”, in the form package.module
if needed:
>>> @patch('package.module.ClassName.attribute', sentinel.attribute)
... def test():
... from package.module import ClassName
... assert ClassName.attribute == sentinel.attribute
...
>>> test()
A nice pattern is to actually decorate test methods themselves:
>>> class MyTest(unittest.TestCase):
... @patch.object(SomeClass, 'attribute', sentinel.attribute)
... def test_something(self):
... self.assertEqual(SomeClass.attribute, sentinel.attribute)
...
>>> original = SomeClass.attribute
>>> MyTest('test_something').test_something()
>>> assert SomeClass.attribute == original
If you want to patch with a Mock, you can use patch()
with only one argument
(or patch.object()
with two arguments). The mock will be created for you and
passed into the test function / method:
>>> class MyTest(unittest.TestCase):
... @patch.object(SomeClass, 'static_method')
... def test_something(self, mock_method):
... SomeClass.static_method()
... mock_method.assert_called_with()
...
>>> MyTest('test_something').test_something()
You can stack up multiple patch decorators using this pattern:
>>> class MyTest(unittest.TestCase):
... @patch('package.module.ClassName1')
... @patch('package.module.ClassName2')
... def test_something(self, MockClass2, MockClass1):
... self.assertIs(package.module.ClassName1, MockClass1)
... self.assertIs(package.module.ClassName2, MockClass2)
...
>>> MyTest('test_something').test_something()
When you nest patch decorators the mocks are passed in to the decorated
function in the same order they applied (the normal python order that
decorators are applied). This means from the bottom up, so in the example
above the mock for test_module.ClassName2
is passed in first.
There is also patch.dict()
for setting values in a dictionary just
during a scope and restoring the dictionary to its original state when the test
ends:
>>> foo = {'key': 'value'}
>>> original = foo.copy()
>>> with patch.dict(foo, {'newkey': 'newvalue'}, clear=True):
... assert foo == {'newkey': 'newvalue'}
...
>>> assert foo == original
patch
, patch.object
and patch.dict
can all be used as context managers.
Where you use patch()
to create a mock for you, you can get a reference to the
mock using the «as» form of the with statement:
>>> class ProductionClass:
... def method(self):
... pass
...
>>> with patch.object(ProductionClass, 'method') as mock_method:
... mock_method.return_value = None
... real = ProductionClass()
... real.method(1, 2, 3)
...
>>> mock_method.assert_called_with(1, 2, 3)
As an alternative patch
, patch.object
and patch.dict
can be used as
class decorators. When used in this way it is the same as applying the
decorator individually to every method whose name starts with «test».
26.6.3. Further Examples¶
Here are some more examples for some slightly more advanced scenarios.
26.6.3.1. Mocking chained calls¶
Mocking chained calls is actually straightforward with mock once you
understand the return_value
attribute. When a mock is called for
the first time, or you fetch its return_value
before it has been called, a
new Mock
is created.
This means that you can see how the object returned from a call to a mocked
object has been used by interrogating the return_value
mock:
>>> mock = Mock()
>>> mock().foo(a=2, b=3)
<Mock name='mock().foo()' id='...'>
>>> mock.return_value.foo.assert_called_with(a=2, b=3)
From here it is a simple step to configure and then make assertions about chained calls. Of course another alternative is writing your code in a more testable way in the first place…
So, suppose we have some code that looks a little bit like this:
>>> class Something:
... def __init__(self):
... self.backend = BackendProvider()
... def method(self):
... response = self.backend.get_endpoint('foobar').create_call('spam', 'eggs').start_call()
... # more code
Assuming that BackendProvider
is already well tested, how do we test
method()
? Specifically, we want to test that the code section # more
code
uses the response object in the correct way.
As this chain of calls is made from an instance attribute we can monkey patch
the backend
attribute on a Something
instance. In this particular case
we are only interested in the return value from the final call to
start_call
so we don’t have much configuration to do. Let’s assume the
object it returns is “file-like”, so we’ll ensure that our response object
uses the builtin open()
as its spec
.
To do this we create a mock instance as our mock backend and create a mock
response object for it. To set the response as the return value for that final
start_call
we could do this:
mock_backend.get_endpoint.return_value.create_call.return_value.start_call.return_value = mock_response
We can do that in a slightly nicer way using the configure_mock()
method to directly set the return value for us:
>>> something = Something()
>>> mock_response = Mock(spec=open)
>>> mock_backend = Mock()
>>> config = {'get_endpoint.return_value.create_call.return_value.start_call.return_value': mock_response}
>>> mock_backend.configure_mock(**config)
With these we monkey patch the «mock backend» in place and can make the real call:
>>> something.backend = mock_backend
>>> something.method()
Using mock_calls
we can check the chained call with a single
assert. A chained call is several calls in one line of code, so there will be
several entries in mock_calls
. We can use call.call_list()
to create
this list of calls for us:
>>> chained = call.get_endpoint('foobar').create_call('spam', 'eggs').start_call()
>>> call_list = chained.call_list()
>>> assert mock_backend.mock_calls == call_list
26.6.3.2. Partial mocking¶
In some tests I wanted to mock out a call to datetime.date.today()
to return a known date, but I didn’t want to prevent the code under test from
creating new date objects. Unfortunately datetime.date
is written in C, and
so I couldn’t just monkey-patch out the static date.today()
method.
I found a simple way of doing this that involved effectively wrapping the date class with a mock, but passing through calls to the constructor to the real class (and returning real instances).
The patch decorator
is used here to
mock out the date
class in the module under test. The side_effect
attribute on the mock date class is then set to a lambda function that returns
a real date. When the mock date class is called a real date will be
constructed and returned by side_effect
.
>>> from datetime import date
>>> with patch('mymodule.date') as mock_date:
... mock_date.today.return_value = date(2010, 10, 8)
... mock_date.side_effect = lambda *args, **kw: date(*args, **kw)
...
... assert mymodule.date.today() == date(2010, 10, 8)
... assert mymodule.date(2009, 6, 8) == date(2009, 6, 8)
...
Note that we don’t patch datetime.date
globally, we patch date
in the
module that uses it. See where to patch.
When date.today()
is called a known date is returned, but calls to the
date(...)
constructor still return normal dates. Without this you can find
yourself having to calculate an expected result using exactly the same
algorithm as the code under test, which is a classic testing anti-pattern.
Calls to the date constructor are recorded in the mock_date
attributes
(call_count
and friends) which may also be useful for your tests.
An alternative way of dealing with mocking dates, or other builtin classes, is discussed in this blog entry.
26.6.3.3. Mocking a Generator Method¶
A Python generator is a function or method that uses the yield
statement
to return a series of values when iterated over [1].
A generator method / function is called to return the generator object. It is
the generator object that is then iterated over. The protocol method for
iteration is __iter__()
, so we can
mock this using a MagicMock
.
Here’s an example class with an «iter» method implemented as a generator:
>>> class Foo:
... def iter(self):
... for i in [1, 2, 3]:
... yield i
...
>>> foo = Foo()
>>> list(foo.iter())
[1, 2, 3]
How would we mock this class, and in particular its «iter» method?
To configure the values returned from the iteration (implicit in the call to
list
), we need to configure the object returned by the call to foo.iter()
.
>>> mock_foo = MagicMock()
>>> mock_foo.iter.return_value = iter([1, 2, 3])
>>> list(mock_foo.iter())
[1, 2, 3]
[1] | There are also generator expressions and more advanced uses of generators, but we aren’t concerned about them here. A very good introduction to generators and how powerful they are is: Generator Tricks for Systems Programmers. |
26.6.3.4. Applying the same patch to every test method¶
If you want several patches in place for multiple test methods the obvious way
is to apply the patch decorators to every method. This can feel like unnecessary
repetition. For Python 2.6 or more recent you can use patch()
(in all its
various forms) as a class decorator. This applies the patches to all test
methods on the class. A test method is identified by methods whose names start
with test
:
>>> @patch('mymodule.SomeClass')
... class MyTest(TestCase):
...
... def test_one(self, MockSomeClass):
... self.assertIs(mymodule.SomeClass, MockSomeClass)
...
... def test_two(self, MockSomeClass):
... self.assertIs(mymodule.SomeClass, MockSomeClass)
...
... def not_a_test(self):
... return 'something'
...
>>> MyTest('test_one').test_one()
>>> MyTest('test_two').test_two()
>>> MyTest('test_two').not_a_test()
'something'
An alternative way of managing patches is to use the patch methods: start and stop.
These allow you to move the patching into your setUp
and tearDown
methods.
>>> class MyTest(TestCase):
... def setUp(self):
... self.patcher = patch('mymodule.foo')
... self.mock_foo = self.patcher.start()
...
... def test_foo(self):
... self.assertIs(mymodule.foo, self.mock_foo)
...
... def tearDown(self):
... self.patcher.stop()
...
>>> MyTest('test_foo').run()
If you use this technique you must ensure that the patching is «undone» by
calling stop
. This can be fiddlier than you might think, because if an
exception is raised in the setUp then tearDown is not called.
unittest.TestCase.addCleanup()
makes this easier:
>>> class MyTest(TestCase):
... def setUp(self):
... patcher = patch('mymodule.foo')
... self.addCleanup(patcher.stop)
... self.mock_foo = patcher.start()
...
... def test_foo(self):
... self.assertIs(mymodule.foo, self.mock_foo)
...
>>> MyTest('test_foo').run()
26.6.3.5. Mocking Unbound Methods¶
Whilst writing tests today I needed to patch an unbound method (patching the
method on the class rather than on the instance). I needed self to be passed
in as the first argument because I want to make asserts about which objects
were calling this particular method. The issue is that you can’t patch with a
mock for this, because if you replace an unbound method with a mock it doesn’t
become a bound method when fetched from the instance, and so it doesn’t get
self passed in. The workaround is to patch the unbound method with a real
function instead. The patch()
decorator makes it so simple to
patch out methods with a mock that having to create a real function becomes a
nuisance.
If you pass autospec=True
to patch then it does the patching with a
real function object. This function object has the same signature as the one
it is replacing, but delegates to a mock under the hood. You still get your
mock auto-created in exactly the same way as before. What it means though, is
that if you use it to patch out an unbound method on a class the mocked
function will be turned into a bound method if it is fetched from an instance.
It will have self
passed in as the first argument, which is exactly what I
wanted:
>>> class Foo:
... def foo(self):
... pass
...
>>> with patch.object(Foo, 'foo', autospec=True) as mock_foo:
... mock_foo.return_value = 'foo'
... foo = Foo()
... foo.foo()
...
'foo'
>>> mock_foo.assert_called_once_with(foo)
If we don’t use autospec=True
then the unbound method is patched out
with a Mock instance instead, and isn’t called with self
.
26.6.3.6. Checking multiple calls with mock¶
mock has a nice API for making assertions about how your mock objects are used.
>>> mock = Mock()
>>> mock.foo_bar.return_value = None
>>> mock.foo_bar('baz', spam='eggs')
>>> mock.foo_bar.assert_called_with('baz', spam='eggs')
If your mock is only being called once you can use the
assert_called_once_with()
method that also asserts that the
call_count
is one.
>>> mock.foo_bar.assert_called_once_with('baz', spam='eggs')
>>> mock.foo_bar()
>>> mock.foo_bar.assert_called_once_with('baz', spam='eggs')
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
AssertionError: Expected to be called once. Called 2 times.
Both assert_called_with
and assert_called_once_with
make assertions about
the most recent call. If your mock is going to be called several times, and
you want to make assertions about all those calls you can use
call_args_list
:
>>> mock = Mock(return_value=None)
>>> mock(1, 2, 3)
>>> mock(4, 5, 6)
>>> mock()
>>> mock.call_args_list
[call(1, 2, 3), call(4, 5, 6), call()]
The call
helper makes it easy to make assertions about these calls. You
can build up a list of expected calls and compare it to call_args_list
. This
looks remarkably similar to the repr of the call_args_list
:
>>> expected = [call(1, 2, 3), call(4, 5, 6), call()]
>>> mock.call_args_list == expected
True
26.6.3.7. Coping with mutable arguments¶
Another situation is rare, but can bite you, is when your mock is called with
mutable arguments. call_args
and call_args_list
store references to the
arguments. If the arguments are mutated by the code under test then you can no
longer make assertions about what the values were when the mock was called.
Here’s some example code that shows the problem. Imagine the following functions defined in “mymodule”:
def frob(val):
pass
def grob(val):
"First frob and then clear val"
frob(val)
val.clear()
When we try to test that grob
calls frob
with the correct argument look
what happens:
>>> with patch('mymodule.frob') as mock_frob:
... val = {6}
... mymodule.grob(val)
...
>>> val
set()
>>> mock_frob.assert_called_with({6})
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
AssertionError: Expected: (({6},), {})
Called with: ((set(),), {})
One possibility would be for mock to copy the arguments you pass in. This could then cause problems if you do assertions that rely on object identity for equality.
Here’s one solution that uses the side_effect
functionality. If you provide a side_effect
function for a mock then
side_effect
will be called with the same args as the mock. This gives us an
opportunity to copy the arguments and store them for later assertions. In this
example I’m using another mock to store the arguments so that I can use the
mock methods for doing the assertion. Again a helper function sets this up for
me.
>>> from copy import deepcopy
>>> from unittest.mock import Mock, patch, DEFAULT
>>> def copy_call_args(mock):
... new_mock = Mock()
... def side_effect(*args, **kwargs):
... args = deepcopy(args)
... kwargs = deepcopy(kwargs)
... new_mock(*args, **kwargs)
... return DEFAULT
... mock.side_effect = side_effect
... return new_mock
...
>>> with patch('mymodule.frob') as mock_frob:
... new_mock = copy_call_args(mock_frob)
... val = {6}
... mymodule.grob(val)
...
>>> new_mock.assert_called_with({6})
>>> new_mock.call_args
call({6})
copy_call_args
is called with the mock that will be called. It returns a new
mock that we do the assertion on. The side_effect
function makes a copy of
the args and calls our new_mock
with the copy.
Nota
If your mock is only going to be used once there is an easier way of
checking arguments at the point they are called. You can simply do the
checking inside a side_effect
function.
>>> def side_effect(arg):
... assert arg == {6}
...
>>> mock = Mock(side_effect=side_effect)
>>> mock({6})
>>> mock(set())
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
AssertionError
An alternative approach is to create a subclass of Mock
or
MagicMock
that copies (using copy.deepcopy()
) the arguments.
Here’s an example implementation:
>>> from copy import deepcopy
>>> class CopyingMock(MagicMock):
... def __call__(self, *args, **kwargs):
... args = deepcopy(args)
... kwargs = deepcopy(kwargs)
... return super(CopyingMock, self).__call__(*args, **kwargs)
...
>>> c = CopyingMock(return_value=None)
>>> arg = set()
>>> c(arg)
>>> arg.add(1)
>>> c.assert_called_with(set())
>>> c.assert_called_with(arg)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
AssertionError: Expected call: mock({1})
Actual call: mock(set())
>>> c.foo
<CopyingMock name='mock.foo' id='...'>
When you subclass Mock
or MagicMock
all dynamically created attributes,
and the return_value
will use your subclass automatically. That means all
children of a CopyingMock
will also have the type CopyingMock
.
26.6.3.8. Nesting Patches¶
Using patch as a context manager is nice, but if you do multiple patches you can end up with nested with statements indenting further and further to the right:
>>> class MyTest(TestCase):
...
... def test_foo(self):
... with patch('mymodule.Foo') as mock_foo:
... with patch('mymodule.Bar') as mock_bar:
... with patch('mymodule.Spam') as mock_spam:
... assert mymodule.Foo is mock_foo
... assert mymodule.Bar is mock_bar
... assert mymodule.Spam is mock_spam
...
>>> original = mymodule.Foo
>>> MyTest('test_foo').test_foo()
>>> assert mymodule.Foo is original
With unittest cleanup
functions and the patch methods: start and stop we can
achieve the same effect without the nested indentation. A simple helper
method, create_patch
, puts the patch in place and returns the created mock
for us:
>>> class MyTest(TestCase):
...
... def create_patch(self, name):
... patcher = patch(name)
... thing = patcher.start()
... self.addCleanup(patcher.stop)
... return thing
...
... def test_foo(self):
... mock_foo = self.create_patch('mymodule.Foo')
... mock_bar = self.create_patch('mymodule.Bar')
... mock_spam = self.create_patch('mymodule.Spam')
...
... assert mymodule.Foo is mock_foo
... assert mymodule.Bar is mock_bar
... assert mymodule.Spam is mock_spam
...
>>> original = mymodule.Foo
>>> MyTest('test_foo').run()
>>> assert mymodule.Foo is original
26.6.3.9. Mocking a dictionary with MagicMock¶
You may want to mock a dictionary, or other container object, recording all access to it whilst having it still behave like a dictionary.
We can do this with MagicMock
, which will behave like a dictionary,
and using side_effect
to delegate dictionary access to a real
underlying dictionary that is under our control.
When the __getitem__()
and __setitem__()
methods of our MagicMock
are called
(normal dictionary access) then side_effect
is called with the key (and in
the case of __setitem__
the value too). We can also control what is returned.
After the MagicMock
has been used we can use attributes like
call_args_list
to assert about how the dictionary was used:
>>> my_dict = {'a': 1, 'b': 2, 'c': 3}
>>> def getitem(name):
... return my_dict[name]
...
>>> def setitem(name, val):
... my_dict[name] = val
...
>>> mock = MagicMock()
>>> mock.__getitem__.side_effect = getitem
>>> mock.__setitem__.side_effect = setitem
Nota
An alternative to using MagicMock
is to use Mock
and only provide
the magic methods you specifically want:
>>> mock = Mock()
>>> mock.__getitem__ = Mock(side_effect=getitem)
>>> mock.__setitem__ = Mock(side_effect=setitem)
A third option is to use MagicMock
but passing in dict
as the spec
(or spec_set) argument so that the MagicMock
created only has
dictionary magic methods available:
>>> mock = MagicMock(spec_set=dict)
>>> mock.__getitem__.side_effect = getitem
>>> mock.__setitem__.side_effect = setitem
With these side effect functions in place, the mock
will behave like a normal
dictionary but recording the access. It even raises a KeyError
if you try
to access a key that doesn’t exist.
>>> mock['a']
1
>>> mock['c']
3
>>> mock['d']
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
KeyError: 'd'
>>> mock['b'] = 'fish'
>>> mock['d'] = 'eggs'
>>> mock['b']
'fish'
>>> mock['d']
'eggs'
After it has been used you can make assertions about the access using the normal mock methods and attributes:
>>> mock.__getitem__.call_args_list
[call('a'), call('c'), call('d'), call('b'), call('d')]
>>> mock.__setitem__.call_args_list
[call('b', 'fish'), call('d', 'eggs')]
>>> my_dict
{'a': 1, 'c': 3, 'b': 'fish', 'd': 'eggs'}
26.6.3.10. Mock subclasses and their attributes¶
There are various reasons why you might want to subclass Mock
. One
reason might be to add helper methods. Here’s a silly example:
>>> class MyMock(MagicMock):
... def has_been_called(self):
... return self.called
...
>>> mymock = MyMock(return_value=None)
>>> mymock
<MyMock id='...'>
>>> mymock.has_been_called()
False
>>> mymock()
>>> mymock.has_been_called()
True
The standard behaviour for Mock
instances is that attributes and the return
value mocks are of the same type as the mock they are accessed on. This ensures
that Mock
attributes are Mocks
and MagicMock
attributes are MagicMocks
[2]. So if you’re subclassing to add helper methods then they’ll also be
available on the attributes and return value mock of instances of your
subclass.
>>> mymock.foo
<MyMock name='mock.foo' id='...'>
>>> mymock.foo.has_been_called()
False
>>> mymock.foo()
<MyMock name='mock.foo()' id='...'>
>>> mymock.foo.has_been_called()
True
Sometimes this is inconvenient. For example, one user is subclassing mock to created a Twisted adaptor. Having this applied to attributes too actually causes errors.
Mock
(in all its flavours) uses a method called _get_child_mock
to create
these «sub-mocks» for attributes and return values. You can prevent your
subclass being used for attributes by overriding this method. The signature is
that it takes arbitrary keyword arguments (**kwargs
) which are then passed
onto the mock constructor:
>>> class Subclass(MagicMock):
... def _get_child_mock(self, **kwargs):
... return MagicMock(**kwargs)
...
>>> mymock = Subclass()
>>> mymock.foo
<MagicMock name='mock.foo' id='...'>
>>> assert isinstance(mymock, Subclass)
>>> assert not isinstance(mymock.foo, Subclass)
>>> assert not isinstance(mymock(), Subclass)
[2] | An exception to this rule are the non-callable mocks. Attributes use the callable variant because otherwise non-callable mocks couldn’t have callable methods. |
26.6.3.11. Mocking imports with patch.dict¶
One situation where mocking can be hard is where you have a local import inside a function. These are harder to mock because they aren’t using an object from the module namespace that we can patch out.
Generally local imports are to be avoided. They are sometimes done to prevent circular dependencies, for which there is usually a much better way to solve the problem (refactor the code) or to prevent «up front costs» by delaying the import. This can also be solved in better ways than an unconditional local import (store the module as a class or module attribute and only do the import on first use).
That aside there is a way to use mock
to affect the results of an import.
Importing fetches an object from the sys.modules
dictionary. Note that it
fetches an object, which need not be a module. Importing a module for the
first time results in a module object being put in sys.modules, so usually
when you import something you get a module back. This need not be the case
however.
This means you can use patch.dict()
to temporarily put a mock in place
in sys.modules
. Any imports whilst this patch is active will fetch the mock.
When the patch is complete (the decorated function exits, the with statement
body is complete or patcher.stop()
is called) then whatever was there
previously will be restored safely.
Here’s an example that mocks out the “fooble” module.
>>> mock = Mock()
>>> with patch.dict('sys.modules', {'fooble': mock}):
... import fooble
... fooble.blob()
...
<Mock name='mock.blob()' id='...'>
>>> assert 'fooble' not in sys.modules
>>> mock.blob.assert_called_once_with()
As you can see the import fooble
succeeds, but on exit there is no “fooble”
left in sys.modules
.
This also works for the from module import name
form:
>>> mock = Mock()
>>> with patch.dict('sys.modules', {'fooble': mock}):
... from fooble import blob
... blob.blip()
...
<Mock name='mock.blob.blip()' id='...'>
>>> mock.blob.blip.assert_called_once_with()
With slightly more work you can also mock package imports:
>>> mock = Mock()
>>> modules = {'package': mock, 'package.module': mock.module}
>>> with patch.dict('sys.modules', modules):
... from package.module import fooble
... fooble()
...
<Mock name='mock.module.fooble()' id='...'>
>>> mock.module.fooble.assert_called_once_with()
26.6.3.12. Tracking order of calls and less verbose call assertions¶
The Mock
class allows you to track the order of method calls on
your mock objects through the method_calls
attribute. This
doesn’t allow you to track the order of calls between separate mock objects,
however we can use mock_calls
to achieve the same effect.
Because mocks track calls to child mocks in mock_calls
, and accessing an
arbitrary attribute of a mock creates a child mock, we can create our separate
mocks from a parent one. Calls to those child mock will then all be recorded,
in order, in the mock_calls
of the parent:
>>> manager = Mock()
>>> mock_foo = manager.foo
>>> mock_bar = manager.bar
>>> mock_foo.something()
<Mock name='mock.foo.something()' id='...'>
>>> mock_bar.other.thing()
<Mock name='mock.bar.other.thing()' id='...'>
>>> manager.mock_calls
[call.foo.something(), call.bar.other.thing()]
We can then assert about the calls, including the order, by comparing with
the mock_calls
attribute on the manager mock:
>>> expected_calls = [call.foo.something(), call.bar.other.thing()]
>>> manager.mock_calls == expected_calls
True
If patch
is creating, and putting in place, your mocks then you can attach
them to a manager mock using the attach_mock()
method. After
attaching calls will be recorded in mock_calls
of the manager.
>>> manager = MagicMock()
>>> with patch('mymodule.Class1') as MockClass1:
... with patch('mymodule.Class2') as MockClass2:
... manager.attach_mock(MockClass1, 'MockClass1')
... manager.attach_mock(MockClass2, 'MockClass2')
... MockClass1().foo()
... MockClass2().bar()
...
<MagicMock name='mock.MockClass1().foo()' id='...'>
<MagicMock name='mock.MockClass2().bar()' id='...'>
>>> manager.mock_calls
[call.MockClass1(),
call.MockClass1().foo(),
call.MockClass2(),
call.MockClass2().bar()]
If many calls have been made, but you’re only interested in a particular
sequence of them then an alternative is to use the
assert_has_calls()
method. This takes a list of calls (constructed
with the call
object). If that sequence of calls are in
mock_calls
then the assert succeeds.
>>> m = MagicMock()
>>> m().foo().bar().baz()
<MagicMock name='mock().foo().bar().baz()' id='...'>
>>> m.one().two().three()
<MagicMock name='mock.one().two().three()' id='...'>
>>> calls = call.one().two().three().call_list()
>>> m.assert_has_calls(calls)
Even though the chained call m.one().two().three()
aren’t the only calls that
have been made to the mock, the assert still succeeds.
Sometimes a mock may have several calls made to it, and you are only interested
in asserting about some of those calls. You may not even care about the
order. In this case you can pass any_order=True
to assert_has_calls
:
>>> m = MagicMock()
>>> m(1), m.two(2, 3), m.seven(7), m.fifty('50')
(...)
>>> calls = [call.fifty('50'), call(1), call.seven(7)]
>>> m.assert_has_calls(calls, any_order=True)
26.6.3.13. More complex argument matching¶
Using the same basic concept as ANY
we can implement matchers to do more
complex assertions on objects used as arguments to mocks.
Suppose we expect some object to be passed to a mock that by default
compares equal based on object identity (which is the Python default for user
defined classes). To use assert_called_with()
we would need to pass
in the exact same object. If we are only interested in some of the attributes
of this object then we can create a matcher that will check these attributes
for us.
You can see in this example how a “standard” call to assert_called_with
isn’t
sufficient:
>>> class Foo:
... def __init__(self, a, b):
... self.a, self.b = a, b
...
>>> mock = Mock(return_value=None)
>>> mock(Foo(1, 2))
>>> mock.assert_called_with(Foo(1, 2))
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
AssertionError: Expected: call(<__main__.Foo object at 0x...>)
Actual call: call(<__main__.Foo object at 0x...>)
A comparison function for our Foo
class might look something like this:
>>> def compare(self, other):
... if not type(self) == type(other):
... return False
... if self.a != other.a:
... return False
... if self.b != other.b:
... return False
... return True
...
And a matcher object that can use comparison functions like this for its equality operation would look something like this:
>>> class Matcher:
... def __init__(self, compare, some_obj):
... self.compare = compare
... self.some_obj = some_obj
... def __eq__(self, other):
... return self.compare(self.some_obj, other)
...
Putting all this together:
>>> match_foo = Matcher(compare, Foo(1, 2))
>>> mock.assert_called_with(match_foo)
The Matcher
is instantiated with our compare function and the Foo
object
we want to compare against. In assert_called_with
the Matcher
equality
method will be called, which compares the object the mock was called with
against the one we created our matcher with. If they match then
assert_called_with
passes, and if they don’t an AssertionError
is raised:
>>> match_wrong = Matcher(compare, Foo(3, 4))
>>> mock.assert_called_with(match_wrong)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
AssertionError: Expected: ((<Matcher object at 0x...>,), {})
Called with: ((<Foo object at 0x...>,), {})
With a bit of tweaking you could have the comparison function raise the
AssertionError
directly and provide a more useful failure message.
As of version 1.5, the Python testing library PyHamcrest provides similar functionality, that may be useful here, in the form of its equality matcher (hamcrest.library.integration.match_equality).