"profile" --- Pure Python profiler
**********************************

**Source code:** Lib/profile.py

======================================================================

Descontinuado desde a versão 3.15, será removido na versão 3.17.

The "profile" module is deprecated and will be removed in Python 3.17.
Use "profiling.tracing" instead.

The "profile" module provides a pure Python implementation of a
deterministic profiler. While useful for understanding profiler
internals or extending profiler behavior through subclassing, its pure
Python implementation introduces significant overhead compared to the
C-based "profiling.tracing" module.

For most profiling tasks, use:

* "profiling.sampling" for production debugging with zero overhead

* "profiling.tracing" for development and testing


Migration
=========

Migrating from "profile" to "profiling.tracing" is straightforward.
The APIs are compatible:

   # Old (deprecated)
   import profile
   profile.run('my_function()')

   # New (recommended)
   import profiling.tracing
   profiling.tracing.run('my_function()')

For most code, replacing "import profile" with "import
profiling.tracing" (and using "profiling.tracing" instead of "profile"
throughout) provides a straightforward migration path.

Nota:

  The "cProfile" module remains available as a backward-compatible
  alias to "profiling.tracing". Existing code using "import cProfile"
  will continue to work without modification.


"profile" and "profiling.tracing" module reference
==================================================

Both the "profile" and "profiling.tracing" modules provide the
following functions:

profile.run(command, filename=None, sort=-1)

   This function takes a single argument that can be passed to the
   "exec()" function, and an optional file name.  In all cases this
   routine executes:

      exec(command, __main__.__dict__, __main__.__dict__)

   and gathers profiling statistics from the execution. If no file
   name is present, then this function automatically creates a "Stats"
   instance and prints a simple profiling report. If the sort value is
   specified, it is passed to this "Stats" instance to control how the
   results are sorted.

profile.runctx(command, globals, locals, filename=None, sort=-1)

   This function is similar to "run()", with added arguments to supply
   the globals and locals mappings for the *command* string. This
   routine executes:

      exec(command, globals, locals)

   and gathers profiling statistics as in the "run()" function above.

class profile.Profile(timer=None, timeunit=0.0, subcalls=True, builtins=True)

   This class is normally only used if more precise control over
   profiling is needed than what the "profiling.tracing.run()"
   function provides.

   A custom timer can be supplied for measuring how long code takes to
   run via the *timer* argument. This must be a function that returns
   a single number representing the current time. If the number is an
   integer, the *timeunit* specifies a multiplier that specifies the
   duration of each unit of time. For example, if the timer returns
   times measured in thousands of seconds, the time unit would be
   ".001".

   Directly using the "Profile" class allows formatting profile
   results without writing the profile data to a file:

      import profiling.tracing
      import pstats
      import io
      from pstats import SortKey

      pr = profiling.tracing.Profile()
      pr.enable()
      # ... do something ...
      pr.disable()
      s = io.StringIO()
      sortby = SortKey.CUMULATIVE
      ps = pstats.Stats(pr, stream=s).sort_stats(sortby)
      ps.print_stats()
      print(s.getvalue())

   The "Profile" class can also be used as a context manager
   (supported only in "profiling.tracing", not in the deprecated
   "profile" module; see Tipos de Gerenciador de Contexto):

      import profiling.tracing

      with profiling.tracing.Profile() as pr:
          # ... do something ...

          pr.print_stats()

   Alterado na versão 3.8: Adicionado suporte a gerenciador de
   contexto.

   enable()

      Start collecting profiling data. Only in "profiling.tracing".

   disable()

      Stop collecting profiling data. Only in "profiling.tracing".

   create_stats()

      Stop collecting profiling data and record the results internally
      as the current profile.

   print_stats(sort=-1)

      Cria um objeto "Stats" com base no perfil atual e imprime os
      resultados para stdout.

      The *sort* parameter specifies the sorting order of the
      displayed statistics. It accepts a single key or a tuple of keys
      to enable multi-level sorting, as in
      "pstats.Stats.sort_stats()".

      Adicionado na versão 3.13: "print_stats()" now accepts a tuple
      of keys.

   dump_stats(filename)

      Escreve os resultados do profile atual para *filename*.

   run(cmd)

      Profile the cmd via "exec()".

   runctx(cmd, globals, locals)

      Profile the cmd via "exec()" with the specified global and local
      environment.

   runcall(func, /, *args, **kwargs)

      Profile "func(*args, **kwargs)"

Note that profiling will only work if the called command/function
actually returns.  If the interpreter is terminated (e.g. via a
"sys.exit()" call during the called command/function execution) no
profiling results will be printed.


Differences from "profiling.tracing"
====================================

The "profile" module differs from "profiling.tracing" in several ways:

**Higher overhead.** The pure Python implementation is significantly
slower than the C implementation, making it unsuitable for profiling
long-running programs or performance-sensitive code.

**Calibration support.** The "profile" module supports calibration to
compensate for profiling overhead. This is not needed in
"profiling.tracing" because the C implementation has negligible
overhead.

**Custom timers.** Both modules support custom timers, but "profile"
accepts timer functions that return tuples (like "os.times()"), while
"profiling.tracing" requires a function returning a single number.

**Subclassing.** The pure Python implementation is easier to subclass
and extend for custom profiling behavior.


What is deterministic profiling?
================================

*Deterministic profiling* is meant to reflect the fact that all
*function call*, *function return*, and *exception* events are
monitored, and precise timings are made for the intervals between
these events (during which time the user's code is executing).  In
contrast, *statistical profiling* (which is provided by the
"profiling.sampling" module) periodically samples the effective
instruction pointer, and deduces where time is being spent.  The
latter technique traditionally involves less overhead (as the code
does not need to be instrumented), but provides only relative
indications of where time is being spent.

In Python, since there is an interpreter active during execution, the
presence of instrumented code is not required in order to do
deterministic profiling. Python automatically provides a *hook*
(optional callback) for each event. In addition, the interpreted
nature of Python tends to add so much overhead to execution, that
deterministic profiling tends to only add small processing overhead in
typical applications.  The result is that deterministic profiling is
not that expensive, yet provides extensive run time statistics about
the execution of a Python program.

Call count statistics can be used to identify bugs in code (surprising
counts), and to identify possible inline-expansion points (high call
counts).  Internal time statistics can be used to identify "hot loops"
that should be carefully optimized.  Cumulative time statistics should
be used to identify high level errors in the selection of algorithms.
Note that the unusual handling of cumulative times in this profiler
allows statistics for recursive implementations of algorithms to be
directly compared to iterative implementations.


Limitações
==========

One limitation has to do with accuracy of timing information. There is
a fundamental problem with deterministic profilers involving accuracy.
The most obvious restriction is that the underlying "clock" is only
ticking at a rate (typically) of about .001 seconds.  Hence no
measurements will be more accurate than the underlying clock.  If
enough measurements are taken, then the "error" will tend to average
out. Unfortunately, removing this first error induces a second source
of error.

The second problem is that it "takes a while" from when an event is
dispatched until the profiler's call to get the time actually *gets*
the state of the clock.  Similarly, there is a certain lag when
exiting the profiler event handler from the time that the clock's
value was obtained (and then squirreled away), until the user's code
is once again executing.  As a result, functions that are called many
times, or call many functions, will typically accumulate this error.
The error that accumulates in this fashion is typically less than the
accuracy of the clock (less than one clock tick), but it *can*
accumulate and become very significant.

The problem is more important with the deprecated "profile" module
than with the lower-overhead "profiling.tracing".  For this reason,
"profile" provides a means of calibrating itself for a given platform
so that this error can be probabilistically (on the average) removed.
After the profiler is calibrated, it will be more accurate (in a least
square sense), but it will sometimes produce negative numbers (when
call counts are exceptionally low, and the gods of probability work
against you :-). )  Do *not* be alarmed by negative numbers in the
profile.  They should *only* appear if you have calibrated your
profiler, and the results are actually better than without
calibration.


Calibration
===========

The profiler of the "profile" module subtracts a constant from each
event handling time to compensate for the overhead of calling the time
function, and socking away the results.  By default, the constant is
0. The following procedure can be used to obtain a better constant for
a given platform (see Limitações).

   import profile
   pr = profile.Profile()
   for i in range(5):
       print(pr.calibrate(10000))

The method executes the number of Python calls given by the argument,
directly and again under the profiler, measuring the time for both. It
then computes the hidden overhead per profiler event, and returns that
as a float.  For example, on a 1.8Ghz Intel Core i5 running macOS, and
using Python's time.process_time() as the timer, the magical number is
about 4.04e-6.

The object of this exercise is to get a fairly consistent result. If
your computer is *very* fast, or your timer function has poor
resolution, you might have to pass 100000, or even 1000000, to get
consistent results.

When you have a consistent answer, there are three ways you can use
it:

   import profile

   # 1. Apply computed bias to all Profile instances created hereafter.
   profile.Profile.bias = your_computed_bias

   # 2. Apply computed bias to a specific Profile instance.
   pr = profile.Profile()
   pr.bias = your_computed_bias

   # 3. Specify computed bias in instance constructor.
   pr = profile.Profile(bias=your_computed_bias)

If you have a choice, you are better off choosing a smaller constant,
and then your results will "less often" show up as negative in profile
statistics.


Using a custom timer
====================

If you want to change how current time is determined (for example, to
force use of wall-clock time or elapsed process time), pass the timing
function you want to the "Profile" class constructor:

   pr = profile.Profile(your_time_func)

The resulting profiler will then call "your_time_func". Depending on
whether you are using "profile.Profile" or
"profiling.tracing.Profile", "your_time_func"'s return value will be
interpreted differently:

"profile.Profile"
   "your_time_func" should return a single number, or a list of
   numbers whose sum is the current time (like what "os.times()"
   returns).  If the function returns a single time number, or the
   list of returned numbers has length 2, then you will get an
   especially fast version of the dispatch routine.

   Be warned that you should calibrate the profiler class for the
   timer function that you choose (see Calibration).  For most
   machines, a timer that returns a lone integer value will provide
   the best results in terms of low overhead during profiling.
   ("os.times()" is *pretty* bad, as it returns a tuple of floating-
   point values).  If you want to substitute a better timer in the
   cleanest fashion, derive a class and hardwire a replacement
   dispatch method that best handles your timer call, along with the
   appropriate calibration constant.

"profiling.tracing.Profile"
   "your_time_func" should return a single number.  If it returns
   integers, you can also invoke the class constructor with a second
   argument specifying the real duration of one unit of time.  For
   example, if "your_integer_time_func" returns times measured in
   thousands of seconds, you would construct the "Profile" instance as
   follows:

      pr = profiling.tracing.Profile(your_integer_time_func, 0.001)

   As the "profiling.tracing.Profile" class cannot be calibrated,
   custom timer functions should be used with care and should be as
   fast as possible. For the best results with a custom timer, it
   might be necessary to hard-code it in the C source of the internal
   "_lsprof" module.

Python 3.3 adds several new functions in "time" that can be used to
make precise measurements of process or wall-clock time. For example,
see "time.perf_counter()".

Ver também:

  "profiling"
     Overview of Python profiling tools.

  "profiling.tracing"
     Recommended replacement for this module.

  "pstats"
     Statistical analysis and formatting for profile data.
