Annotations Best Practices¶
- author:
Larry Hastings
Accessing The Annotations Dict Of An Object In Python 3.10 And Newer¶
Python 3.10 adds a new function to the standard library:
inspect.get_annotations()
. In Python versions 3.10
through 3.13, calling this function is the best practice for
accessing the annotations dict of any object that supports
annotations. This function can also "un-stringize"
stringized annotations for you.
In Python 3.14, there is a new annotationlib
module
with functionality for working with annotations. This
includes a annotationlib.get_annotations()
function,
which supersedes inspect.get_annotations()
.
If for some reason inspect.get_annotations()
isn't
viable for your use case, you may access the
__annotations__
data member manually. Best practice
for this changed in Python 3.10 as well: as of Python 3.10,
o.__annotations__
is guaranteed to always work
on Python functions, classes, and modules. If you're
certain the object you're examining is one of these three
specific objects, you may simply use o.__annotations__
to get at the object's annotations dict.
However, other types of callables--for example,
callables created by functools.partial()
--may
not have an __annotations__
attribute defined. When
accessing the __annotations__
of a possibly unknown
object, best practice in Python versions 3.10 and
newer is to call getattr()
with three arguments,
for example getattr(o, '__annotations__', None)
.
Before Python 3.10, accessing __annotations__
on a class that
defines no annotations but that has a parent class with
annotations would return the parent's __annotations__
.
In Python 3.10 and newer, the child class's annotations
will be an empty dict instead.
Accessing The Annotations Dict Of An Object In Python 3.9 And Older¶
In Python 3.9 and older, accessing the annotations dict of an object is much more complicated than in newer versions. The problem is a design flaw in these older versions of Python, specifically to do with class annotations.
Best practice for accessing the annotations dict of other
objects--functions, other callables, and modules--is the same
as best practice for 3.10, assuming you aren't calling
inspect.get_annotations()
: you should use three-argument
getattr()
to access the object's __annotations__
attribute.
Unfortunately, this isn't best practice for classes. The problem
is that, since __annotations__
is optional on classes, and
because classes can inherit attributes from their base classes,
accessing the __annotations__
attribute of a class may
inadvertently return the annotations dict of a base class.
As an example:
class Base:
a: int = 3
b: str = 'abc'
class Derived(Base):
pass
print(Derived.__annotations__)
This will print the annotations dict from Base
, not
Derived
.
Your code will have to have a separate code path if the object
you're examining is a class (isinstance(o, type)
).
In that case, best practice relies on an implementation detail
of Python 3.9 and before: if a class has annotations defined,
they are stored in the class's __dict__
dictionary. Since
the class may or may not have annotations defined, best practice
is to call the get()
method on the class dict.
To put it all together, here is some sample code that safely
accesses the __annotations__
attribute on an arbitrary
object in Python 3.9 and before:
if isinstance(o, type):
ann = o.__dict__.get('__annotations__', None)
else:
ann = getattr(o, '__annotations__', None)
After running this code, ann
should be either a
dictionary or None
. You're encouraged to double-check
the type of ann
using isinstance()
before further
examination.
Note that some exotic or malformed type objects may not have
a __dict__
attribute, so for extra safety you may also wish
to use getattr()
to access __dict__
.
Manually Un-Stringizing Stringized Annotations¶
In situations where some annotations may be "stringized",
and you wish to evaluate those strings to produce the
Python values they represent, it really is best to
call inspect.get_annotations()
to do this work
for you.
If you're using Python 3.9 or older, or if for some reason
you can't use inspect.get_annotations()
, you'll need
to duplicate its logic. You're encouraged to examine the
implementation of inspect.get_annotations()
in the
current Python version and follow a similar approach.
In a nutshell, if you wish to evaluate a stringized annotation
on an arbitrary object o
:
If
o
is a module, useo.__dict__
as theglobals
when callingeval()
.If
o
is a class, usesys.modules[o.__module__].__dict__
as theglobals
, anddict(vars(o))
as thelocals
, when callingeval()
.If
o
is a wrapped callable usingfunctools.update_wrapper()
,functools.wraps()
, orfunctools.partial()
, iteratively unwrap it by accessing eithero.__wrapped__
oro.func
as appropriate, until you have found the root unwrapped function.If
o
is a callable (but not a class), useo.__globals__
as the globals when callingeval()
.
However, not all string values used as annotations can
be successfully turned into Python values by eval()
.
String values could theoretically contain any valid string,
and in practice there are valid use cases for type hints that
require annotating with string values that specifically
can't be evaluated. For example:
PEP 604 union types using
|
, before support for this was added to Python 3.10.Definitions that aren't needed at runtime, only imported when
typing.TYPE_CHECKING
is true.
If eval()
attempts to evaluate such values, it will
fail and raise an exception. So, when designing a library
API that works with annotations, it's recommended to only
attempt to evaluate string values when explicitly requested
to by the caller.
Best Practices For __annotations__
In Any Python Version¶
You should avoid assigning to the
__annotations__
member of objects directly. Let Python manage setting__annotations__
.If you do assign directly to the
__annotations__
member of an object, you should always set it to adict
object.You should avoid accessing
__annotations__
directly on any object. Instead, useannotationlib.get_annotations()
(Python 3.14+) orinspect.get_annotations()
(Python 3.10+).If you do directly access the
__annotations__
member of an object, you should ensure that it's a dictionary before attempting to examine its contents.You should avoid modifying
__annotations__
dicts.You should avoid deleting the
__annotations__
attribute of an object.
__annotations__
Quirks¶
In all versions of Python 3, function
objects lazy-create an annotations dict if no annotations
are defined on that object. You can delete the __annotations__
attribute using del fn.__annotations__
, but if you then
access fn.__annotations__
the object will create a new empty dict
that it will store and return as its annotations. Deleting the
annotations on a function before it has lazily created its annotations
dict will throw an AttributeError
; using del fn.__annotations__
twice in a row is guaranteed to always throw an AttributeError
.
Everything in the above paragraph also applies to class and module objects in Python 3.10 and newer.
In all versions of Python 3, you can set __annotations__
on a function object to None
. However, subsequently
accessing the annotations on that object using fn.__annotations__
will lazy-create an empty dictionary as per the first paragraph of
this section. This is not true of modules and classes, in any Python
version; those objects permit setting __annotations__
to any
Python value, and will retain whatever value is set.
If Python stringizes your annotations for you
(using from __future__ import annotations
), and you
specify a string as an annotation, the string will
itself be quoted. In effect the annotation is quoted
twice. For example:
from __future__ import annotations
def foo(a: "str"): pass
print(foo.__annotations__)
This prints {'a': "'str'"}
. This shouldn't really be considered
a "quirk"; it's mentioned here simply because it might be surprising.
If you use a class with a custom metaclass and access __annotations__
on the class, you may observe unexpected behavior; see
749 for some examples. You can avoid these
quirks by using annotationlib.get_annotations()
on Python 3.14+ or
inspect.get_annotations()
on Python 3.10+. On earlier versions of
Python, you can avoid these bugs by accessing the annotations from the
class's __dict__
(e.g., cls.__dict__.get('__annotations__', None)
).