15. Floating Point Arithmetic:  Issues and Limitations
******************************************************

Floating-point numbers are represented in computer hardware as base 2
(binary) fractions.  For example, the **decimal** fraction "0.625" has
value 6/10 + 2/100 + 5/1000, and in the same way the **binary**
fraction "0.101" has value 1/2 + 0/4 + 1/8. These two fractions have
identical values, the only real difference being that the first is
written in base 10 fractional notation, and the second in base 2.

Unfortunately, most decimal fractions cannot be represented exactly as
binary fractions.  A consequence is that, in general, the decimal
floating-point numbers you enter are only approximated by the binary
floating-point numbers actually stored in the machine.

The problem is easier to understand at first in base 10.  Consider the
fraction 1/3.  You can approximate that as a base 10 fraction:

   0.3

or, better,

   0.33

or, better,

   0.333

and so on.  No matter how many digits you're willing to write down,
the result will never be exactly 1/3, but will be an increasingly
better approximation of 1/3.

In the same way, no matter how many base 2 digits you're willing to
use, the decimal value 0.1 cannot be represented exactly as a base 2
fraction.  In base 2, 1/10 is the infinitely repeating fraction

   0.0001100110011001100110011001100110011001100110011...

Stop at any finite number of bits, and you get an approximation.  On
most machines today, floats are approximated using a binary fraction
with the numerator using the first 53 bits starting with the most
significant bit and with the denominator as a power of two.  In the
case of 1/10, the binary fraction is "3602879701896397 / 2 ** 55"
which is close to but not exactly equal to the true value of 1/10.

Many users are not aware of the approximation because of the way
values are displayed.  Python only prints a decimal approximation to
the true decimal value of the binary approximation stored by the
machine.  On most machines, if Python were to print the true decimal
value of the binary approximation stored for 0.1, it would have to
display:

   >>> 0.1
   0.1000000000000000055511151231257827021181583404541015625

That is more digits than most people find useful, so Python keeps the
number of digits manageable by displaying a rounded value instead:

   >>> 1 / 10
   0.1

Just remember, even though the printed result looks like the exact
value of 1/10, the actual stored value is the nearest representable
binary fraction.

Interestingly, there are many different decimal numbers that share the
same nearest approximate binary fraction.  For example, the numbers
"0.1" and "0.10000000000000001" and
"0.1000000000000000055511151231257827021181583404541015625" are all
approximated by "3602879701896397 / 2 ** 55".  Since all of these
decimal values share the same approximation, any one of them could be
displayed while still preserving the invariant "eval(repr(x)) == x".

Historically, the Python prompt and built-in "repr()" function would
choose the one with 17 significant digits, "0.10000000000000001".
Starting with Python 3.1, Python (on most systems) is now able to
choose the shortest of these and simply display "0.1".

Note that this is in the very nature of binary floating-point: this is
not a bug in Python, and it is not a bug in your code either.  You'll
see the same kind of thing in all languages that support your
hardware's floating-point arithmetic (although some languages may not
*display* the difference by default, or in all output modes).

For more pleasant output, you may wish to use string formatting to
produce a limited number of significant digits:

   >>> format(math.pi, '.12g')  # give 12 significant digits
   '3.14159265359'

   >>> format(math.pi, '.2f')   # give 2 digits after the point
   '3.14'

   >>> repr(math.pi)
   '3.141592653589793'

It's important to realize that this is, in a real sense, an illusion:
you're simply rounding the *display* of the true machine value.

One illusion may beget another.  For example, since 0.1 is not exactly
1/10, summing three values of 0.1 may not yield exactly 0.3, either:

   >>> 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 == 0.3
   False

Also, since the 0.1 cannot get any closer to the exact value of 1/10
and 0.3 cannot get any closer to the exact value of 3/10, then pre-
rounding with "round()" function cannot help:

   >>> round(0.1, 1) + round(0.1, 1) + round(0.1, 1) == round(0.3, 1)
   False

Though the numbers cannot be made closer to their intended exact
values, the "math.isclose()" function can be useful for comparing
inexact values:

   >>> math.isclose(0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1, 0.3)
   True

Alternatively, the "round()" function can be used to compare rough
approximations:

   .. doctest::

>>> round(math.pi, ndigits=2) == round(22 / 7, ndigits=2)
True

Binary floating-point arithmetic holds many surprises like this.  The
problem with "0.1" is explained in precise detail below, in the
"Representation Error" section.  See Examples of Floating Point
Problems for a pleasant summary of how binary floating point works and
the kinds of problems commonly encountered in practice.  Also see The
Perils of Floating Point for a more complete account of other common
surprises.

As that says near the end, "there are no easy answers."  Still, don't
be unduly wary of floating-point!  The errors in Python float
operations are inherited from the floating-point hardware, and on most
machines are on the order of no more than 1 part in 2**53 per
operation.  That's more than adequate for most tasks, but you do need
to keep in mind that it's not decimal arithmetic and that every float
operation can suffer a new rounding error.

While pathological cases do exist, for most casual use of floating-
point arithmetic you'll see the result you expect in the end if you
simply round the display of your final results to the number of
decimal digits you expect. "str()" usually suffices, and for finer
control see the "str.format()" method's format specifiers in Format
String Syntax.

For use cases which require exact decimal representation, try using
the "decimal" module which implements decimal arithmetic suitable for
accounting applications and high-precision applications.

Another form of exact arithmetic is supported by the "fractions"
module which implements arithmetic based on rational numbers (so the
numbers like 1/3 can be represented exactly).

If you are a heavy user of floating point operations you should take a
look at the NumPy package and many other packages for mathematical and
statistical operations supplied by the SciPy project. See
<https://scipy.org>.

Python provides tools that may help on those rare occasions when you
really *do* want to know the exact value of a float.  The
"float.as_integer_ratio()" method expresses the value of a float as a
fraction:

   >>> x = 3.14159
   >>> x.as_integer_ratio()
   (3537115888337719, 1125899906842624)

Since the ratio is exact, it can be used to losslessly recreate the
original value:

   >>> x == 3537115888337719 / 1125899906842624
   True

The "float.hex()" method expresses a float in hexadecimal (base 16),
again giving the exact value stored by your computer:

   >>> x.hex()
   '0x1.921f9f01b866ep+1'

This precise hexadecimal representation can be used to reconstruct the
float value exactly:

   >>> x == float.fromhex('0x1.921f9f01b866ep+1')
   True

Since the representation is exact, it is useful for reliably porting
values across different versions of Python (platform independence) and
exchanging data with other languages that support the same format
(such as Java and C99).

Another helpful tool is the "sum()" function which helps mitigate
loss-of-precision during summation.  It uses extended precision for
intermediate rounding steps as values are added onto a running total.
That can make a difference in overall accuracy so that the errors do
not accumulate to the point where they affect the final total:

   >>> 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.1 == 1.0
   False
   >>> sum([0.1] * 10) == 1.0
   True

The "math.fsum()" goes further and tracks all of the "lost digits" as
values are added onto a running total so that the result has only a
single rounding.  This is slower than "sum()" but will be more
accurate in uncommon cases where large magnitude inputs mostly cancel
each other out leaving a final sum near zero:

   >>> arr = [-0.10430216751806065, -266310978.67179024, 143401161448607.16,
   ...        -143401161400469.7, 266262841.31058735, -0.003244936839808227]
   >>> float(sum(map(Fraction, arr)))   # Exact summation with single rounding
   8.042173697819788e-13
   >>> math.fsum(arr)                   # Single rounding
   8.042173697819788e-13
   >>> sum(arr)                         # Multiple roundings in extended precision
   8.042178034628478e-13
   >>> total = 0.0
   >>> for x in arr:
   ...     total += x                   # Multiple roundings in standard precision
   ...
   >>> total                            # Straight addition has no correct digits!
   -0.0051575902860057365


15.1. Representation Error
==========================

This section explains the "0.1" example in detail, and shows how you
can perform an exact analysis of cases like this yourself.  Basic
familiarity with binary floating-point representation is assumed.

*Representation error* refers to the fact that some (most, actually)
decimal fractions cannot be represented exactly as binary (base 2)
fractions. This is the chief reason why Python (or Perl, C, C++, Java,
Fortran, and many others) often won't display the exact decimal number
you expect.

Why is that?  1/10 is not exactly representable as a binary fraction.
Almost all machines today (November 2000) use IEEE-754 floating point
arithmetic, and almost all platforms map Python floats to IEEE-754
"double precision".  754 doubles contain 53 bits of precision, so on
input the computer strives to convert 0.1 to the closest fraction it
can of the form *J*/2***N* where *J* is an integer containing exactly
53 bits.  Rewriting

   1 / 10 ~= J / (2**N)

as

   J ~= 2**N / 10

and recalling that *J* has exactly 53 bits (is ">= 2**52" but "<
2**53"), the best value for *N* is 56:

   >>> 2**52 <=  2**56 // 10  < 2**53
   True

That is, 56 is the only value for *N* that leaves *J* with exactly 53
bits.  The best possible value for *J* is then that quotient rounded:

   >>> q, r = divmod(2**56, 10)
   >>> r
   6

Since the remainder is more than half of 10, the best approximation is
obtained by rounding up:

   >>> q+1
   7205759403792794

Therefore the best possible approximation to 1/10 in 754 double
precision is:

   7205759403792794 / 2 ** 56

Dividing both the numerator and denominator by two reduces the
fraction to:

   3602879701896397 / 2 ** 55

Note that since we rounded up, this is actually a little bit larger
than 1/10; if we had not rounded up, the quotient would have been a
little bit smaller than 1/10.  But in no case can it be *exactly*
1/10!

So the computer never "sees" 1/10:  what it sees is the exact fraction
given above, the best 754 double approximation it can get:

   >>> 0.1 * 2 ** 55
   3602879701896397.0

If we multiply that fraction by 10**55, we can see the value out to 55
decimal digits:

   >>> 3602879701896397 * 10 ** 55 // 2 ** 55
   1000000000000000055511151231257827021181583404541015625

meaning that the exact number stored in the computer is equal to the
decimal value
0.1000000000000000055511151231257827021181583404541015625. Instead of
displaying the full decimal value, many languages (including older
versions of Python), round the result to 17 significant digits:

   >>> format(0.1, '.17f')
   '0.10000000000000001'

The "fractions" and "decimal" modules make these calculations easy:

   >>> from decimal import Decimal
   >>> from fractions import Fraction

   >>> Fraction.from_float(0.1)
   Fraction(3602879701896397, 36028797018963968)

   >>> (0.1).as_integer_ratio()
   (3602879701896397, 36028797018963968)

   >>> Decimal.from_float(0.1)
   Decimal('0.1000000000000000055511151231257827021181583404541015625')

   >>> format(Decimal.from_float(0.1), '.17')
   '0.10000000000000001'
